High-volume ferrous foundries
Gray and ductile iron and steel foundries running moving lines where takt, scrap and pourer availability set the ceiling on output.
Ferrous and non-ferrous sand, die, permanent-mold and investment casting foundries and die casters between $150M and $30B in revenue, running melt, molding, coremaking, pouring, solidification, fettling and finishing lines.
Built with foundries and die casters melting iron, steel, aluminium, magnesium and copper
[PLACEHOLDER] Design-partner names are illustrative until first references are signed.
Gray and ductile iron and steel foundries running moving lines where takt, scrap and pourer availability set the ceiling on output.
Lightweighting and EV structural programs where hydrogen, inclusions and shrinkage decide whether a megacasting ships.
HPDC and LPDC cells where shot profile, die thermal state and porosity are the difference between cycle time and rework.
AS9100 and NADCAP work where CT is the verdict, genealogy is contractual and an escape is existential.
Groups that want one loop, one evidence model and one set of benchmarks across plants that currently solve everything differently.
Pump bodies, fittings, electrical components and tight-envelope magnesium work where chemistry and pour temperature dominate quality.
Owns production rate, quality, scrap, yield and safety. Signs when a single cell improvement clears payback and when the safety story survives contact with EHS.
These are the pains our ICP names before we ask. If none of them is true at your plant, we are probably not the right vendor yet.
Tiny art or jobbing shops with no repeatable primary casting scope. There is no wedge cell to baseline and no repeat volume to learn from.
Sites unwilling to integrate melt, molding, pouring and inspection systems under IP and security controls. Without data access the loop cannot close.
Buyers seeking a generic horizontal dashboard rather than a system of action. We are not a BI layer over a historian.
Everything in this plant is inspected after the value is added. We need to know at shakeout, not at the X-ray cabinet.
Simulation told us what should happen. Nothing told us what did happen, heat by heat.
If a robot is going to pour, the safety case has to be airtight before anyone talks about yield.
Design-partner voices are illustrative composites of foundry buyer conversations. [PLACEHOLDER — replace with named references after first case studies.]
3–5
Design partners in the first phase
1
Wedge cell to start
100%
Pilots start in shadow mode
0
Write-backs before a safety review
Phase 1 · shadow mode
We measure the real scrap, rework, melt-loss, yield and inspection numbers on the cell over a representative period, using your records as ground truth.
Phase 1 → 2
Agent predictions scored against your own inspection results for that alloy and geometry family before anything is recommended to an engineer.
Phase 2
The agent recommends melt, mold, pour and cooling moves and predicts soundness; your metallurgist approves each one and every correction trains the models.
Phase 2 output
A defensible before-and-after on first-pass yield, scrap, porosity rate and melt energy — the artefact your finance team will ask for.
Phase 3
Low-risk cells graduate to adaptive control inside approved process windows, with rollback armed and exceptions escalating.
Commercial
Design partners get preferential pricing on adjacent cells and modules, in exchange for case-study rights once the numbers are in.
We are recruiting three to five paid design partners around one measurable wedge: robotic pour and fill control, X-ray and CT porosity detection, or melt-chemistry optimisation.